Sunday 11 August 2013

In Misstep, Obama Discusses Sealed Indictment on Benghazi



President Barack Obama was a lawyer before he became a politician, but on Friday he broke one of the most basic legal rules: He publicly discussed a sealed indictment.
Speaking at a White House press conference about government surveillance, terrorism, and other topics, the president was asked about his past statements that the people who attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, last year would be brought to justice.
“We have informed, I think, the public that there’s a sealed indictment. It’s sealed for a reason. But we are intent on capturing those who carried out this attack, and we’re going to stay on it until we get them,’’ Mr. Obama said.
While the president of the United States can declassify top secret intelligence information on his own say-so, disclosing secret grand jury material is a different matter. Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure clearly states: “… no person may disclose the indictment’s existence except as necessary to issue or execute a warrant or summons.’’

UPDATE: A White House official said the president “was simply referencing widely reported information and was not asked about, nor did he comment on any specific indictment.’’
A violation of the rule can result in a finding of contempt of court – although it’s extremely unlikely anyone at the Justice Department would pursue the issue as it relates to the president. A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment.


culled from www.blogs.wsj.com

No comments:

Post a Comment