There seems to be no end in sight to the crisis rocking the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) as its National Working Committee (NWC) Monday wielded the big stick yesterday, when it suspended its former acting National Chairman, Alhaji Abubakar Kawu Baraje; the party’s National Secretary, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola; its former Deputy National Chairman, Dr. Sam Sam Jaja; and National Vice Chairman, Northwest of the breakaway faction of the PDP, Ambassador Ibrahim Kazuare.
Ostensibly, the decision was meant to forestall any move by the New PDP
to enforce the reinstatement of Oyinlola as the party’s scribe
following a Court of Appeal judgment Monday reversing his removal by a
lower court.
Also, PDP directed that the four suspended party members should face
the Umaru Dikko-led National Disciplinary Committee of the party, while
maintaining that the party was yet to get the Court of Appeal order that
reinstated Oyinlola as the national secretary.
But Oyinlola, in a swift reaction said: “This is part of the impunity we are protesting against. None of us has been queried or requested to give explanations for any alleged offence.
But Oyinlola, in a swift reaction said: “This is part of the impunity we are protesting against. None of us has been queried or requested to give explanations for any alleged offence.
“And if they are reacting to the issue of the New PDP, why did they
decide to leave out the serving state governors, senators and members of
the House of Representatives who have been very vocal? It’s all an
attempt to circumvent the ruling of the Court of Appeal.
“Certainly, the last has not been heard on this matter and I am sure that the truth will prevail over falsehood.”
“Certainly, the last has not been heard on this matter and I am sure that the truth will prevail over falsehood.”
He added that the suspension of the four members was due to their
involvement in “identity theft and their factionalisation of the PDP
that eventually led to the formation of a faction by the name ‘New PDP’
despite the order of the Federal High Court and the position of the
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) that there is no crisis
within the ruling party.”
Metuh therefore listed the various constitutional breaches of the
suspended officials to include Sections 58(1), (g), (h) and (i), stating
that these relevant provisions constitute issues that bring the PDP to
disrepute, while their decision to walk out of the special national
convention of the party led to disaffection among members of the party.
He specifically stated that the party delayed in wielding the big
stick, because it wanted to ensure reconciliation and allow the
suspended officials to purge themselves of their various anti-party
activities, but such had failed.
Metuh, who stressed that Oyinlola’s suspension had nothing to do with
the Court of Appeal ruling, said: “As far as PDP is concerned, we are
yet to receive any Court of Appeal order. The party has not received any
judgment or any enrolled order from the Court of Appeal. Until we are
served, there is nothing the party can do to the contrary.”
He added: “Members of the party are not happy with the activities of
the faction that has constituted itself to a nuisance and is involved in
party identity theft. We have been treating our brothers with kid
gloves thinking that they would see reason and come back to their
senses.”
However, prior to his suspension, alongside other members of the party, the order by the Court of Appeal that had directed the reinstatement of Oyinlola had fractured the already fragile situation within the PDP, as the party was in a dilemma over what to do with his planned return.
However, prior to his suspension, alongside other members of the party, the order by the Court of Appeal that had directed the reinstatement of Oyinlola had fractured the already fragile situation within the PDP, as the party was in a dilemma over what to do with his planned return.
It was gathered that former President Olusegun Obasanjo had contacted
President Goodluck Jonathan, urging him to use the Court of Appeal’s
ruling to heal the crisis in the party.
The former president’s advice, notwithstanding, THISDAY gathered that
at the last count, members of the National Working Committee (NWC) held
three separate meetings yesterday on the Oyinlola dilemma.
In the first meeting yesterday morning held at the Wuse 2 residence of
the National Chairman of PDP, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, the committee
reviewed the court judgment and its implications.
Though there was no consensus among the members at the meeting, it was
agreed that they should inform the president on the outcome of their
meeting.
At the meeting, some members of the NWC canvassed the need for the
appeal at the Supreme Court and further follow up with a request for a
stay of execution.
However, some members of the NWC warned against being in contempt of the Court of Appeal order.
However, some members of the NWC warned against being in contempt of the Court of Appeal order.
It was at this point that the NWC members proceeded to the Presidential
Villa, where the members met with Jonathan on how to handle the court
order.
At the meeting with the president, Jonathan was said to be in support
of Oyinlola’s reinstatement, but held that the former Osun State
governor must severe relations with the seven aggrieved governors of the
party and other members of the faction.
The meeting, however, was not conclusive, even after the president
informed the NWC members of Obasanjo’s position on the court order.
The NWC members had argued that it was unfair for the faction and the
group of seven governors to move for the enforcement of Oyinlola’s
reinstatement, because when Justice Elvis Chukwu of the Federal High
Court directed that the faction should cease to exist, the order was not
obeyed as they continued to use the party’s logo, issue statements and
hold meetings.
THISDAY was told Tukur, in particular, was not happy with the court ruling on Oyinlola and did not hide his feelings about it. It was at this juncture that the NWC members agreed to meet again without Tukur to reach a consensus.
THISDAY was told Tukur, in particular, was not happy with the court ruling on Oyinlola and did not hide his feelings about it. It was at this juncture that the NWC members agreed to meet again without Tukur to reach a consensus.
The NWC members then returned to the national secretariat, where they
held another meeting and thereafter left at 3.40 pm to brief the
national chairman on the outcome of the last meeting.
Meanwhile, it was gathered yesterday that Oyinlola had obtained a
Certified True Copy (CTC) of the Court of Appeal judgment and will
officially serve both the PDP and INEC with the document.
When THISDAY contacted INEC, the Chief Press Secretary to the INEC
Chairman, Kayode Idowu described the court’s directive as a “purely PDP
affair”, stating, “When the first court was served and implemented, the
party informed the commission. This time around, when PDP decides on
what to do, then the commission should be informed. This is INEC’s
position for now.”
Also, no less than 65 officers of the State Security Services (SSS)
yesterday had mounted surveillance within and outside the national
secretariat of the PDP, with some of them hidden in adjoining buildings
as snipers. They parked their Nissan vehicles and Peugeot vans adjacent
to the PDP national secretariat.
Despite the presence of security personnel, Oyinlola did not show up at
the national secretariat, despite the claims by the faction of the
party that they would storm the national secretariat of the party to
enforce his reinstatement.
Reacting to the suspension of the four officials, the National
Publicity Secretary of the splinter PDP, Eze Chukwuemeka Eze, said: “The
problem we are having with Tukur and his NWC is that they lack not only
democratic character but lack common understanding of the PDP
constitution.
“To us this is an abuse of the judiciary, the Nigeria Constitution on
fair hearing and most importantly the PDP constitution of 2009, as
amended, Article 21 Section 9, which states and I quote:
‘Notwithstanding any other provision of this constitution relating to
discipline, no executive committee at any level except NEC (National
Executive Committee) shall entertain any question of discipline as may
relate or concern a member of the NEC, public officer holder, that is,
ministers, ambassadors, special advisers, or any member of the
legislative houses!’
“Article 21.10: ‘No disciplinary committee at any level except the National Disciplinary Committee shall impose any punishment provided under Article 21.7 of the constitution arising from any disciplinary on any person named in subsection 21.9 of this constitution.’
“Article 21.10: ‘No disciplinary committee at any level except the National Disciplinary Committee shall impose any punishment provided under Article 21.7 of the constitution arising from any disciplinary on any person named in subsection 21.9 of this constitution.’
“With these sections of our constitution, considering that Oyinlola by
his position as the national secretary, the process for his suspension
was in violation of the constitution of the party.”
SOURCE: www.thisdaylive.com
That is their business not ours.
ReplyDeleteIt's all for their own selfish interest.