The results are the first to suggest a trans-generational contributor to the developmental disorder.
The study, published in the journal JAMA Psychiatry, is the
first to examine the potential legacy that a mother’s experience with
childhood abuse could have on the health of her own children. The
findings are especially sobering given the latest statistics released from the Centers for Disease Control, which found a significantly higher rate of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) — one in 50 compared to one in 88 from a report released in 2012 — among school-aged children than previously thought.
The authors of the JAMA Psychiatry paper studied more than
50,000 women enrolled in the Nurse’s Health Study II, who were asked
about any history of abuse before they were 12. The questions delved
into both physical and emotional abuse, as the women evaluated whether
they had been hit hard enough to leave bruises, as well as whether
adults or caregivers had insulted, screamed or yelled at them. They also
filled out questionnaires about whether their own children were
diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders. The scientists also had access
to the nurses’ health records, so they could adjust for other maternal
health factors known to influence autism risk, including nine
pregnancy-related conditions such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, alcohol consumption and smoking.
Women who reported physical, emotional, or sexual abuse when they
were young were more likely to have a child with autism compared to
women who were not abused. The more severely the women were abused, the
higher their chances of having a child with autism; compared to women
who weren’t abused, those who endured the most serious mistreatment were
60% as likely to have an autistic child.
Because it’s possible that a mother’s exposure to abuse as a child
could also lead her to engage in behaviors associated with harming the
fetus — such as smoking, drinking during pregnancy, using drugs, being
overweight, having preterm labor or giving birth to a premature or low birth weight baby —
the scientists also calculated how much these factors contributed to
the risk of ASD in the next generation. To their surprise, these
conditions explained only 7% of the heightened risk among the abused
women. That meant that abuse was exerting more lasting effects on the
women’s bodies that were translating into an increased risk of autism in
their children.
How? The researchers believe that some of the lifestyle circumstances
associated with abuse, such as poor nutrition, could be responsible for
some of the association. It’s also possible that abuse causes
biological changes in a woman’s immune system, including disruption of
the stress response, that
could lead to harmful effects on a developing fetus. Studies have shown
that autistic children showed abnormal stress responses, and it’s
possible that a mother’s altered stress reaction could be passed on to
her child. “Maternal inflammation affects the developing brain, and
maternal inflammation and immune function have been hypothesized to be
causes of autism,” the researchers write.
The researchers also speculate that childhood abuse can leave women
in a state of chronic stress; the constant release of stress-related
hormones could also increase a developing child’s chances of developing
autism, since such androgens have been associated with autistic
symptoms. Finally, a mother’s childhood abuse could be an indicator of a
genetic risk for mental illness, which is often associated with abuse
of youngsters. Studies showed that mental illness and autism may share genetic risk factors, “therefore, the perpetration of child abuse
by grandparents and experience of abuse in childhood by the mother may
be indicators of genetic risk for autism in the child,” the study
authors write.
“Childhood abuse is associated with a wide array of health problems
in the person who experiences it, including both mental health outcomes
like depression and anxiety, and physical health outcomes like
depression and anxiety, and physical health outcomes like obesity and
lung disease,” said senior study author Marc Weisskopf, an associate
professor of environmental and occupational epidemiology at Harvard
School of Public Health, in a statement. “Our research suggests that the
effects of childhood abuse may also reach across generations.”
Is that legacy enough to explain the apparent rise in ASD documented
in the most recent government data? The CDC data was based on parental
reports of autism; a representative sample of parents were asked whether
a doctor had diagnosed their child with autism, and some experts
caution that such reports are not as reliable as health records
documenting the disorder. Still, the latest statistics suggest that at
least awareness of ASDs is increasing, and with it, potential
explanations for what might be contributing to the disorder.
If childhood abuse turns out to be one of these reasons for the rise
in autism cases, then efforts to prevent it take on new urgency, since
such interventions can benefit more than just one victim.
culled from TIMES MAGAZINE
No comments:
Post a Comment