The allegations by the ruling Peoples Democratic Party, (PDP) that the
suspended CBN Governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi gave opposition APC
N1billion to open offices across the country, came as a surprise, but it
has now put things in proper perspective. What has however, come as a
bigger surprise is that the usually vociferous party has kept a
deafening silence on the grave allegation leveled against it, pretending
not to have seen or read about it in the papers. Its usually active and
outspoken spokesman has not deemed it necessary to oblige Nigerians a
reaction from his party to such a grave allegation. It brings to good
reasoning then that the allegation may have some truth to it. Otherwise,
how can the opposition, usually quick to issue press statements on any
issue, not react to such a grave accusation that damages its reputation
and exposes it to ridicule and public odium?
Going by PDP’s allegations, APC is a principal beneficiary of a
reckless public official who turned public funds in its custody, to his
personal property to be used as he pleases without being accountable to
anyone because CBN Act gave him autonomy or better still a ‘sovereignty’
to operate in any island and therefore to do as he wishes.
Instructively, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi the banker turned ‘‘activist’’ and
‘’crusader’’ for remittances of oil revenue has not deemed it fit to
respond to the damaging allegations against him by the PDP.
The spirited defence the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC),
gave the now suspended governor of the Central Bank, CBN, left many
people wondering if the beleaguered CBN governor’s office had not become
an extension of the APC party secretariat. The party had accused the
President of witch-hunting the holy Mallam who is openly eyeing the
Emirship seat. APC had claimed that Sanusi was being punished because of
his allegations that $20billion was not remitted to the Federation
Account. Yet Sanusi himself had flipped-flopped over the actual amount
that was missing. He had earlier claimed $49.8billion and then reverted
to $12billon, settled for $10.8billion before arriving at the ‘final’
$20billion.
The APC did not mind those inconsistencies. All that mattered was
seeing Sanusi’s claim as its fight to rescue Nigeria. However, latest
developments have shown that perhaps APC’s concern was less altruistic
after all. It was a position taken by a party on the brink of losing a
trusted friend and a source of free funds they have possibly been using
to mobilise their ‘‘phantom 28 million members.’’
For those who don’t know, the ruling Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP),
had alleged that from the N680billion allegedly frittered away by Sanusi
when he was in charge at the CBN, the opposition party benefitted not
less than N53billion. The PDP said that notable stalwarts of the party
got contracts from Sanusi when he was in the CBN.
Olisa Metuh, the spokesman of the PDP, had said that investigations
revealed that the All Progressives Congress (APC) and its stalwarts were
beneficiaries of siphoned CBN money through surreptitious diversion by
the suspended CBN governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi.
Metuh asserted that a questionable N48 billion contract was awarded to
one of the leaders of the APC just as another N5 billion was equally
paid to another stalwart of the opposition party as consultancy fee.
If one may ask; Where in the world is N5 billion paid for such nebulous
service as consultancy fee to an individual? Where is that done except
in Nigeria? And the beneficiary is one of those pretenders strutting
around on a mission to rescue Nigeria. How tragic for Nigeria that those
who milk the country to its bones are the ones parading themselves as
people on a rescue mission to save the country.
Metuh further alleged that: “in addition to the N1 billion diverted by
the bank to the party, the bank donated N100 million each to some
chieftains of APC to fund their activities last year. The bank also
diverted over N1billion to the APC to open offices across the nation.”
In total, these come to N53billion. And then suddenly, the CBN governor
became an “activist” and a “politician” probably fighting and funding
the APC battle from within. And the party too cheered on like a pampered
baby being cuddled by a doting mother. APC was on a roll and it was
enjoying the darts and insults being dished out by Sanusi. Perhaps, who
knows, the party may have goaded Sanusi on to become confrontational in
the belief that the President can only sack him with two third of
senate members. And audaciously he dared the President to go to the
Senate, knowing full well that APC senators will block any such move.
Until the cookies came tumbling down, many thought that all the energy
and vigour behind the party’s frequent statements were borne out of
genuine desire to protect our national institutions.
Alas, it has come to light that the Party was one of the big
beneficiaries of fraudulent diversion of taxpayers money to fund its
activities. It has come to light that the same party that prides itself
as progressive also benefitted from the looting of Nigeria by the holy
Mallam who carried on as if he was clean. It has now come to light that
all those strong-worded press releases by APC in defence of Sansui were
based on the pecuniary gains it got from the holy Mallam. Indeed, it
has come to light that the abuses and recklessness of Sanusi Lamido
Sanusi as Governor of the CBN can only be rivaled by the direct looting
of the bank by Abacha. If one may ask; since when has it become the
brief of the CBN to fund political parties? Is this what the cry for
autonomy means? And why was it APC that Sanusi chose to give money and
not any of the other political parties in the country? If Sanusi and APC
can’t explain this, perhaps, their defenders will oblige Nigerian some
reactions.
In saner climes, the outrage this kind of revelation would have
generated would have ended the careers of so many people. But this is
Nigeria where if you catch a thief, he ask you, ‘‘Am I the only one’’?
or he will ask, ‘‘what about you’’? The next thing, he will run to court
to get ex parte restraining security agencies from arrest him or better
still order of perpetual injunction from arresting. And there are ever
so willing judges who despite knowing how illegal such orders are, grant
them without hesitation. Pronto! The thief is free to wreak more havoc
on the system.
However, how one may choose to look at it, Metuh’s allegations have
raised new questions. But the greater question is why APC,
characteristic of its style, has not deemed it fit to respond to the
allegations made by the ruling party which the Party has always vilified
as corruption personified. APC as a party has always carried on with an
air of puritanism. The party and its leaders have always given the
impression that they don’t dip their hands into the public till. In
other words, corruption is an anathema to the party. But in stark
contradiction, the lifestyles of the party’s leaders do not give any
credence to this pretentious Spartan disposition of the party.
In pursuance of its duty of keeping the ruling party on its toes, APC
has always taken the PDP to the cleaners in the way it has been handling
the affairs of the country. But the allegations that APC and some of
its leading figures were beneficiaries of the Father Christmas
disposition of holy Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi has put a blight on the
change campaign the opposition party launched as its battle cry to
wrestle power from the ruling party.
What is strange to many political watchers is that APC has not
officially responded to the allegations of Metuh. This is unlike APC.
Its spokesman, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, has suddenly been silent. Yet this
is a man who is always unsparing when attacking the ruling party or when
responding to any issue.
A newspaper (not THISDAY) which claimed to have spoken with Mohammed
on the telephone reported that the APC chief did not seem to deny that
its top members had ‘worked’ for the CBN. He said the issue was whether
the said job was done or not.
“The question to ask is whether whoever got the job did it. If he did
not, then the EFCC and the Police should go after such a person.”
On whether the party collected money from the suspended CBN governor to open offices, Mohammed said this was untrue.
On whether the party collected money from the suspended CBN governor to open offices, Mohammed said this was untrue.
Mohammed’s response (if this can be called one) does not seem to hold
water. Reading between the lines, it is obvious that he did not deny the
fact that APC leaders worked for the CBN as a ‘consultants.’ It was
more of a question of whether those who got those ‘consultancy’ jobs
executed the briefs they were given. Secondly, it is debatable if APC
would not have gone to the streets crying blue murder if it was a PDP
stalwart that was paid N5billion for ‘consultancy’ job.
Not surprisingly too, APC has been shouting that the CBN is autonomous.
Good argument. Only that the party has not deemed it fit to ask what
kind of autonomy would make a CBN Governor pay N20billion in one year as
consultancy fee to lawyers; spend about N4billion on newspapers and
periodicals, spend another N1.4billion for lunch on policemen and other
security guards? And of course, the autonomy that made a CBN governor to
donate N1billion to the opposition party to open party offices across
the country. These are pertinent questions, which border on strict
patriotism, that an opposition party should have asked and perhaps
forced the hand of the ruling party to take a second look at the Act
establishing the CBN in the first place.
However, the APC does not even have to do that again. It is even
debatable if it could do that as the party has become an interested
party in the whole saga. But the saga could only have worked against the
said autonomy of the CBN. Now the Senate is poised to amend the Act of
the CBN as questions are still being asked why an autonomy would make a
CBN governor spend hundreds of billions of tax payers’ money, on any
cause that catches his fancy, including funding a particular political
party with taxpayers money.
While the nation is still awaiting an official response from APC, over
the allegations made by the PDP, it has shown that to the party (APC)
corruption seems to have different colours. When it is committed by an
opposition figure, it is pardonable but when it involves the PDP or any
of its members, it is corruption in its strict terms. And that is why
many political watchers have been asking where the APC would get
campaign funds from since the party does not ‘touch’ public funds.
Perhaps, another donation from Sanusi would help out. SOURCE:www.thisdaylive.com
No comments:
Post a Comment