It disappeared Saturday
en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing over the Gulf of Thailand,
somewhere between Malaysia and Vietnam. It's hard to believe that such
huge questions remain three days after the Boeing 777-200ER went
missing, carrying 227 passengers and 12 crew members. These questions
are so unprecedented that experts have been carefully speculating about
possible explanations.
Here are four scenarios they're talking about, and the related facts:
1. Scenario: Mechanical failure?
Fact: The
absence of a debris field suggests the possibility that pilots were
forced to ditch the plane and it landed on water without breaking up,
finally sinking to the ocean floor.
Analysis: But
if that were the case, then why no emergency signal? These planes are
able to perform a "miracle on the Hudson" maneuver. They have the
ability to glide more than 100 miles and belly land on the water with
both engines out, says former 777 pilot Keith Wolzinger, now a civil
aviation consultant with The Spectrum Group. During the time it would
take for a plane to glide 100 miles, it seems likely that pilots would
be able able to send an SOS.
Fact: The
missing plane had suffered a clipped wing tip in the past, but Boeing
repaired it, and the jet was safe to fly, said Malaysia Airlines CEO
Ahmad Jauhari Yahya on Sunday.
Analysis:
"Anytime there's been previous damage to an airplane, even though it's
been repaired, and repaired within standards ... it kind of sends a
warning flag," says Wolzinger. Experts agree the Boeing 777 is one of
the world's most reliable aircraft. During its development it was
subject to some of the most rigorous testing in commercial aviation
history. "I've been talking with colleagues," Wolzinger says. "We're all
baffled by this." The 777 boasts some of the most powerful and
well-tested engines in the world, he says. "The reliability of airliner
engines in general is impeccable these days," he says. "This is a safe
plane."
2. Scenario: Pilot error
Fact: So far, there are no known indications that pilot error contributed to the aircraft going missing.
Analysis:
Some aviation experts have compared Flight 370 to the crash of Air
France Flight 447 in 2009. All 228 passengers and crew died when the
plane went down in a storm in the Atlantic en route from Brazil to
Paris. After an expensive, nearly two-year search across the deep ocean
floor, the twin-engine Airbus A330's wreckage was finally found and the
voice and data recorders recovered. A French investigation
blamed flight crew for failing to understand "they were in a stall
situation and therefore never undertook any recovery maneuvers." But
unlike Flight 447, weather was reported as good along Flight 370's scheduled route and didn't appear to present a threat.
Asiana Airlines Flight
217 -- a Boeing 777 -- fell short during a runway approach last July at
San Francisco International Airport. Three people were killed and more
than 180 others hurt. National Transportation Safety Board investigators have focused on pilot reliance on automated flight systems as a possible contributor to the crash, but a final report has not yet been released.
Fact: Two stolen passports have been linked to people who held tickets for the flight.
Analysis: This
points to the possibility that someone on a terrorism watch list may
have boarded the plane and blown it up. However, the stolen passports
don't necessarily mean the plane was an actual target. It's possible,
says former U.S. Department of Transportation Inspector General Mary
Schiavo, that terrorists may have been performing a "dry run" for a
future attack. Or, Schiavo said, "it could be just criminal business as
usual," because "there are lots of stolen passports" used by travelers
around the world.
Fact: So far, no debris field of plane wreckage has been linked to the 777, which would indicate a bomb blast.
Analysis: When
Robert Francis, former vice chairman of the U.S. National
Transportation Safety Board, heard about the missing plane, his
immediate thought was: "For some reason the aircraft blew up and there
was no signal, there was nothing." The fact that the plane disappeared
from radar without warning indicated to Francis "there was something
unprecedented that hasn't happened before."
What about satellite
technology? Is it possible that data from orbiting satellites might show
a flash or infrared heat signature from an explosion? Very unlikely,
says satellite expert Brian Weeden, who spent years tracking space junk
in orbit for the U.S. Air Force. Dozens of government and private
satellites orbit the earth, looking down from distances from 300
kilometers to 1,500 kilometers (185 to 930 miles). It's a long shot that
one of them coincidentally floated over at the exact right time and
location to capture a flash from an explosion.
However, there's an "off
chance," Weeden says, that a super secret U.S. government satellite
orbiting 22,000 miles in space might have grabbed evidence. These
satellites are in geosynchronous orbit. As a group, they can observe
virtually the entire globe. "We know that their mission is to detect
ballistic missile launches via heat," says Weeden, now a technical
adviser for Secure World Foundation. "We don't know if they're sensitive
enough to track something like a bomb blast, even if that's what
happened."
Then there's another
unanswerable question: Would the government hesitate to release such an
image for fear of revealing the satellite system's ultraclassified
capability?
4. Scenario: Hijacking?
Fact: Before
it disappeared, radar data indicated the plane may have turned around
to head back to Kuala Lumpur. Is that a clue that a hijacker had ordered
the plane to change course?
Analysis: So far, there have been no reports that the flight crew sent any signals that a hijacking had occurred.
SOURCE: www.cnn.com
No comments:
Post a Comment